Less Famous Time Travel Paradoxes

September 8, 2009

Everybody’s heard of the Grandfather Paradox, where you go back in time and kill your grandfather, thus causing yourself to never be born, thus causing you never to travel back in time and kill your grandfather, thus trapping you in an unresolvable temporal paradox.

But this isn’t the only time travel paradox that can happen, or even the most likely (who would want to kill their own grandfather?). So I have uploaded this list of less famous time travel paradoxes, along with my personal theories (as a self-proclaimed doctor of timeology) as to how each would resolve.

The Holy Grail Paradox

A time-traveler is on the quest for the Holy Grail. He feels pretty confident, and he is absolutely sure that he will eventually find it, so to save himself some work, he travels into the future and–sure enough!–there his future self is, staring at the Holy Grail in awe. The time-traveler grabs the Holy Grail and returns to his original time line, where he is so amazed that he is holding the relic in his hands that he stares at it in awe for some time. Suddenly, a time vortex opens and his past self jumps out and grabs the Grail from him, before disappearing into the past.

How it Resolves Itself: In actuality, the time-traveler discovers that the Grail he originally stole from himself was really just a dirty cup from the kitchen sink.

The Pizza Slice Paradox

A cartoon rendiction of a wild pizza, the animal that is hunted and killed so that we may enjoy its delicious cheeseflesh.

A cartoon rendiction of a wild pizza, the animal that is hunted and killed so that we may enjoy its delicious cheeseflesh. This animal features heavily in some temporal paradoxes.

A time-traveler eats a delicious slice of pizza and enjoys the experience so much, he travels back one hour and eats the same slice of pizza before he originally ate it. Therefore, no pizza existed for him to eat originally. Additionally, the two slices (the same slice twice) are digesting simultaneously in the time-traveler’s stomach.

How it Resolves Itself: Indigestion.

The Dance Move Paradox

A time-traveler sees someone else on the other side of the club do an amazing dance move. Since the time-traveler is a highly skilled dancer, he realizes that it is a new move and that its inventor will become both rich and famous, so he gets in his time machine and travels back in time and goes back to the same club, where he debuts the move on his own.

How it Resolves Itself: As it turns out, the move was never that good to begin with, and it was only the subtle power of unconscious self-love that had caused the time-traveler to admire the dance to begin with. Therefore, however this paradox resolves, it will be of no interest to the competitive choreography industry.

The Blog Post Paradox

Time traveler runs a blog at gregkarber.com. However, he’s completely out of ideas, so he time travels into the future and forces himself at gunpoint to come up with some ideas, knowing the eventually he will be held at gunpoint for ideas. Fortunately, when he is held at gunpoint, he won’t actually have to write the ideas, since he will have already stolen them at gunpoint from himself previously.

How it Resolves Itself: None of the ideas are very good, especially the one entitled “Less Famous Time Travel Paradoxes.”


History and Theology

September 8, 2009

I went home to Fort Smith this weekend and shot a short commentary of something I saw in Books-a-Million. I wanted to edit it together and fancy it up a bit, but I’m having some computer problems.

Like I said in the YouTube description: Fort Smith, AR is one of the few places where the geological ages comprising the formation of the Earth are known by their God-given names: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, and Saturday.


Google, Tell Me Why

September 5, 2009

If you type “why” into Google, the pop-down window on the search bar suggests the following common searchers (as of Saturday, Sept. 5, 2009):

- why is the sky blue
- why do men have nipples
- why did the chicken cross the road
- why do cats purr
- why men cheat
- why did chris brown with rihanna
- why did chris brown beat up rihanna
- why did chris brown feat rihanna
- why do dogs eat poop
- why did i get married

A few of these questions seem unanswerable. For example, you can say that the sky is blue because of the light refraction through the Earth’s atmosphere, but that only explains why it comes to us in the wavelength that we perceive as blue. Why we perceive the color blue as blue is a mystery that all of philosophy and neuroscience have been unable to nail down.

“Why did I get married?” is either endemic of a population that misunderstands exactly what kind of information Google is capable of relaying to you or, alternatively, simply reflects interest in the Tyler Perry film.

Similarly, there happens to be a book that answers why men have nipples, a joke that explains why “the” chicken crossed “the” road (answer: it was seeking out a better life for its family on the more economically prosperous other side). The mystery of cats purring is also easily answered: they do it to manipulate you.

This website says that dogs eat poop for 20 reasons. Number six is “simply to pass the time,” which makes since because I usually only eat poop when I’ve got a few minutes to pass before the The People’s Court airs and I figure, hey, why not, I need something to occupy me for the next couple minutes.

The Chris Brown stuff is a little more mysterious. It seems to be a combination of legitimate Chris Brown searches combined with Google’s sentence mashing ability. The real question behind “why did chris brown with rihanna” isn’t why, it’s what Chris Brown did with Rihanna: a word seems to be missing. That’s answered by the next question: “why did chris brown beat up rihanna.”

This website provides three possibilities:

1. Chris was cheating on her. Rihanna found out and “hit him while he was driving and he flipped out and beat her up.”

2. “Rihanna Gave Chris Brown Herpes”

3. Rihanna dumped him, causing him to “flip out” and beat her up.

Though I don’t really think any of these actually seem to explain why. They seem more like answers to the question “What happened in the moments immediately preceding Chris Brown beating up Rihanna?”

These answers all seem to describe why by saying he “flipped out.” If only more great mysteries could be explained with those words: why is it all here? (Sometime, so long ago, the universe flipped out, and here we are.) But it’s nice to know that Google is doing its best not only to answer, but also anticipate, the great mysteries its users have.


Problems I Have With the Board Game Monopoly

September 3, 2009

1. Every game lasts for six hours and then suddenly ends when one person bankrupts another person, takes all their stuff, and then owns half the board.

2. I don’t understand why opening a hotel raises the rates: shouldn’t a house cost more money to rent than a hotel?

3. I don’t know where you’re from, but back home in Arkansas, irons are not legally allowed to own real estate. Maybe that’ll change with a Supreme Court decision or something like that, but until then: it’s just not realistic.

4. The police in the world of Monopoly are excessively arbitrary. I’ve known some asshole police, but never one that sent me directly to jail just for landing on his space.

5. The fact that it encourages illegal business practices. The point of Clue is to catch the bad guy, not to murder Mr. Body and get away with it. Honestly, I’d be okay with it if they weren’t so aggressively marketing to children, using cartoon characters like the devious Mr. Monopoly, who you’re supposed to like, I guess, despite him being obviously designed to look like a robber baron.

6. The fact that during every single game I’ve ever played in which someone else had the Park Place/Boardwalk monopoly, I have landed on both of those spaces in a row.

7. “Get out of jail free” cards. They’re making a mockery of the justice system. Instead, the cards should read, “Get out of jail for the price of a hefty campaign contribution.”

8. The guy who claimed he invented it didn’t really invent it.

9. I don’t understand the concept of Go, nor why you get $200 for “passing” it. Is Go a physical place, or a metaphysical concept? Who is giving this money out? Is it the bank? Mr. Monopoly himself? I don’t know: I’ve learned to always be suspicious of a deal that looks too good to be true, and I think that Go is a perfect example. There’s gotta be some catch. I don’t know what it is, but I’m thinking it has something to do with coercing strangers into playing the world’s most boring boardgame.

10. I never win.


Dawn of the (Ethically) Dead: A Short Story

September 3, 2009

Dave looked out the one-inch peephole of the cement bunker. Sure enough, the view was the same as it had been for weeks: zombies, zombies, and more zombies, doing what they do, just milling around, bumping into themselves, occasionally taking a bite out of each other.

“Hey, how come they don’t have to eat, you suppose?” Dave asked.

Jim, the only other person Dave knew who was still alive, maybe the only other person who was still alive, answered from the opposite corner of their 10′x10′ bunker: “What makes you say they don’t have to eat?”

“Well, they seem to be doing fine out there, and none of them have had a bite to eat in weeks, except what they get from each other, and that doesn’t really hold up. I mean, conservation of energy, right? If they keep just eating each other, eventually the system’s gotta wind down, right? But it isn’t, they’re still going out there.”

“Let’s hope they eat each other up.”

“Nah, because here’’s the deal: they’re not snacking on each other cause they’re hungry, or at least, it doesn’t seem like that. It seems like they just sometimes bite what’s in front of them. Maybe cause they all look human. I’ve never seen one take more than a bite out of their neighbor.” He turned back to look at Jim. “Nothing like what they do to each other.”

When Dave turned and put his eyes back on the peephole, Jim stole a glance at their food reserves. A couple dozen pounds of dried meet, various canned goods, not much more. Thank God they had the water filtration device, or they would have died months ago. But maybe that would have been better, Jim thought. Dehydration is quick and moves swiftly from lightheadedness and confusion to coma. Starvation is a different story. Starvation is a protracted experience, and painful beyond belief. A man will do almost anything for food when he’s starving to death.

“They’ve gotta be hungry by now, right?” Dave continued, his eyes still out the peep hole. “It’s been weeks.”

“I don’t think they get hungry.”

“Really?”

“I don’t think they get anything. I don’t think they are anything. They just are.”

“Huh?”

“I mean I don’t think they have thoughts. I don’t think they have a mind. They don’t suffer pain or experience pleasure, don’t have hunger or thirst. They don’t plan where they’re getting their next meal or worry about it not coming. Inside, there’s nothing there. That’s why their eyes look so…”

But Dave didn’t need him to finish. He knew what Jim was talking about. How their eyes looked empty, hollow. It wasn’t like the movies, where people mistook the reanimated corpses of their friends and family for their actual loved ones. No, there could be no mistaking that look.

Jim continued: “That’s why it’s not wrong to kill them.”

“Course it ain’t wrong, they’re trying to eat us. It’s us or them.”

“It wasn’t us or them when you started taking pot shots from the peephole, was it? You knew you weren’t going to kill them all, but you shot a few of them anyway. That wasn’t self-defense.”

“Nah, but it was fun.”

“And the reason it was fun and not mentally deranged is because they don’t have subjective experiences. They don’t have personal, interior lives. Our minds, our ability to suffer or to experience pleasure is what makes us morally worthwhile. That’s why it’s wrong to torture a puppy dog, because the dog can suffer, because it’s an entity that desires things.”

Dave asked, “You think there are any dogs out there anymore?”

Jim thought about it for a moment. “No, probably not.”

“Doesn’t really seem like much of a world to live in anymore,” Dave said, “if there ain’t any dogs left in it. Just us and them.”

“But you see what I’m saying?” Jim said. “They are us! They have the same bodies, the same brains, the same everything! The only difference is that they don’t have minds. So they don’t have morality or conscience. They don’t even see things, because they have no mind to see with. Their brains operate entirely unconsciously, in the same way that ours control our heart beats. That’s the only difference.”

“What about not needing to eat? Or not having no reservations against cannibalism? Or being able to walk around with your leg broken and not complain about it.”

“Those are trivial. Philosophically speaking, that is.”

Dave rolled his eyes and went back to the peephole. Jim glanced over at their automatic rifle and the few rounds they had remaining. They had used the vast majority of their ammunition getting to the bunker, and Dave had used most of what was left making revenge kills through the peephole. “But you know what the funny thing is about minds, Dave?”

“Nuh-huh, what?” Dave asked, without turning back around.

“The only mind you really know exists is your own. With regards to anyone else’s, you’re just assuming.”

Dave turned around, seemingly interested. “How do you figure?”

“Well, the reason we know that our own minds exist is because we actively experience them all the time. Like Descartes said, cogito ergo sum, or roughly, ‘I think, therefore I am.’ But we can’t ever experience someone else’s mind.”

“But you can talk to someone, and they can tell you, ‘Hey, I have a mind!’”

“Ah, yes, but maybe that’s just their brain unconsciously responding to language, stimulus and response. That’s not direct evidence. You can’t measure a mind.”

“But you could measure a brain, right, do some of them brain scans, figure out what matches up with what and then you’d know.”

“But you wouldn’t, you see, because, here’s the kicker, nobody knows how consciousness is created. Some philosophers and scientists think we’ll never know. The ones with more faith say that we’ll know someday, that we’ll discover something and it’ll reveal to us this deep mystery, but none of them have a clue what this something might be.”

Dave said nothing to this, and Jim was worried he’d lost him. Never mind, though, this wasn’t for Dave. This was a justification for Jim and Jim alone.

He continued: ”Nobody knows why it’s like something to be a person. We think that this is a rare phenomenon, but maybe if you’re feeling generous, you’ll become a panpsychic and say that everything is conscious. Like trees and rifles and dust.”

“Well, that seems a bit ridiculous.”

“Or maybe,” Jim continued, “if you’re feeling skeptical, if you’re feeling a bit miserly, you’ll go the skeptic’s route, and say that you’ll only believe what you can see, what you can measure, and without evidence otherwise, you’ll just go on and assume that you’re the only person who actually has a mind. This is called solipsism.”

Dave was back staring through the peephole, and while he wasn’t looking, Jim reached over and picked up the rifle. They kept it loaded with the safety on, and Jim slowly switched it off, softly, so that Dave couldn’t hear.

“And the skeptic solipsist, you see, is freed from the moral bounds that otherwise would constrain his behavior, because, as you must see, if you don’t believe in other minds, if you don’t believe that it’s like something to be someone else, then you’d have no problem killing another person if it benefitted you, if you were hungry, for example, or knew you soon would be.”

He raised the rifle and pointed it at the back of Dave’s head. And, like that odd feeling you sometimes get when you’re being watched, Dave seemed to know something was up, too.

“So, Dave, it’s not that I’m a monster. I’m just a skeptic.”


Ways in Which My Roommate, Eric, Has Cheated at Clue

August 29, 2009

1. Peeking inside the envelope when other players weren’t looking.

2. Lying and saying that he had neither Col. Mustard, nor the knife, when he most definitely had both.

3. Moving Prof. Plum to the Hall when it was neither his figure nor turn.

4. Inventing new room, the Arboretum, and insisting other players “rule it out” before giving final guess.

5. Claiming a secret passageway transported his figure to a Monopoly board, allowing it to reap huge benefits in hotel construction, thus securing a high-priced attorney for defense.

6. Grabbing the board by its edges and hurling it into the air, and then declaring that, because the game did not reach completion, it must be declared a draw.

7. Requiring “proof beyond a reasonable doubt,” rather than contents of “diminutive and questionable manilla envelope.”

8. Attempting to kill his opponents with a tiny plastic knife.


KFC Double Down Sandwich

August 27, 2009

Is anyone concerned that the Double Down Sandwich, seen above (and estimated by the Vancouver Sun to contain 1228 calories, far greater than the inexplicably low 590 that KFC “guessed”–they haven’t done real work-ups yet) seems to bear a shocking resemblance to Tracy Jordan’s Meat Machine?

Tracy Jordan: “Dr. Spaceman, is it true that bread rots your brain?”

Dr. Spaceman: “We have no way of knowing, because the powerful bread lobby keeps blocking my research!

MEAT IS THE NEW BREAD!

Also, I thought maybe it’ll be nice to quote Col. Sanders at a time like this. So, here’s Col. Sanders on KFC’s mashed potatoes (and yes, this is a real quote): “That friggin’ … outfit …. They prostituted every goddamn thing I had. I had the greatest gravy in the world and those sons of bitches they dragged it out and extended it and watered it down that I’m so goddamn mad.”

I love that the colonel will say “goddamn” but not “fucking.” He was quite the gentleman. Speaking of the Colonel, did you know that he wasn’t really a colonel?,

Kentucky Governor Ruby Laffoon made him an honorary “Kentucky Colonel,” a title which carries no duties or priveleges save membership in the Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels. After this, Harland Sanders decided to start calling himself “Colonel” and dressing like a Southern gentlemen in order to promote himself.

You know, it’s sad when you can’t even trust the mascot of an international fast-food business. Next thing, we’re gonna find out that Ronald’s not a clown and the King is a tyrant.


Shake and Bake Meth

August 25, 2009
Combine these ingredients in the right order to make meth. If you mess one thing up; however, they will explode. Its a new gameshow, coming to Fox.

Combine these ingredients in the right order to make meth. If you mess one thing up; however, they will explode. It's a new gameshow, coming to Fox.

The number seven item on Google Hot Trends today is “how to make shake and bake meth.” I’m not joking. Now, the Google Hot Trends aren’t the 100 most searched for terms on Google: they are the terms rising fastest. Still, that’s a little unsettling. Why is shake and bake meth suddenly so popular?

Now, since I am committed to doing the research and bringing it back here, regardless of what FBI Lists I may land myself on in the process, I’ve Googled “how to make shake and bake meth.”

And lemme tell you, some crazy shit is going on.

According to MSN.com, this “new meth formula avoids anti-drug laws.” Now it seems there are no reasons not to do meth! But wait, before you run down to the police station screaming, “I’m high on shake and bake meth! There’s nothing you motherfuckas can do to me!” Let’s be clear: the meth isn’t legal, it’s just harder to prevent people from making it.

From the article:

The “shake-and-bake” approach has become popular because it requires a relatively small number of pills of the decongestant pseudoephedrine — an amount easily obtained under even the toughest anti-meth laws that have been adopted across the nation to restrict large purchases of some cold medication.

Now, my girlfriend Kara used to work at Walgreens, and she’s told me various stories of wasted druggies coming in, claiming colds so severe they need five or six boxes of the 24 Hour Sudafed. Usually these people are denied this purchase, but now, they won’t be deterred.

The Internet is really changing things, though. Used to, if you wanted to know how to make an illegal drug, you’d have to ask your illegal drug buddies. Now, you can just go to Google, one of America’s finest corporations, and they’ll tell you. And now, I’m telling you.

But I’ve done the research for you. Now all you have to do is get the ingredients, get in your car, start driving around, and following the instructions below. Here it is, ladies and gentlemen, a five star recipe for making meth that I found on the Internet:

1. Get a bottle.

2. Put a bunch of baking soda on it.

3. Pour vinegar into it.

4. Do not screw on the cap or it will explode.

Happy mething!


How Scary is Scooby-Doo?

August 25, 2009

In the comments section of a YouTube video entitled The Scooby Doo Show – To Switch a Witch Part 1/3, LaurenElizabethxxx writes:

how is that witch scary? I fell off my bed laughing when she appeared

Which seems a bizarre complaint to have for a children’s program, not to mention one that contains a laugh track, as many of those old Hanna-Barbera cartoons did.

But apparently some other people agree. Wntwgirl2u writes:

woah that is 1 freakin creepy witch.i may b overexaggerating but i think i may hav nightmares about her 2nite

And Fatal Assassin who says:

Oh man The Scooby Doo Show has some really scary witches!

Go the episode and see for yourself (she appears in the first few seconds), then come back here and vote. I didn’t turn on protection against repeat votes, so feel free to vote as many times as you want:

But there’s another issue in the episode, as well. SlumsOvShaolin writes:

It’s not a phallic symbol you dumbasses.

I tend to disagree: I think there’s no doubting that it’s a phallic symbol, and the fact that her name is Melissa Wilcox doesn’t help, either. I’m telling you, the Doo is worse than The Lion King!


Anecdotal Evidence that Proves Some Sh*t

August 24, 2009

I was reading the comments on a post at the Heritage Foundation’s website a couple days ago. I’m not going to give a link because I don’t want to give them any more publicity, not that the two or three click-throughs from my blog would do anything to the massive viewing statistics the Heritage Foundation is piling up, but one comment caught my eye and I just had to say something.

Regarding global warming, someone who goes by the name “dennis florida” (I wonder if he’s related to Hannah Montana?) writes:

i have been working outdoors in the masonry busness for over 30 years. i have never seen any evidence to convince me of global warming. some summers were hot, some were mild. some winters were cold. some were mild……….i think they call it weather. in july. nashville had a record temperature of 58. this was in al gore’s back yard.maybe GOD is trying to tell us something. kentucky also set a record for july by not hitting 90 degree’s. i believe GOD is still in control.

Okay, despite the fact that, as has been established over and over and over again, global warming causes unpredictable weather, so the whole “it was cold in July!” argument is not only fallacious (as it confuses single samples of weather data with overall climate trends), but just plain silly. It’s actually evidence in support of global climate change!

And ignoring the fact that he knows how to interpret the actions of God (who is apparently trying to send us hints on policy), and forgetting that he’s claimed he can detect and remember the average temperatures of previous summers and extrapolate long-term trends from them, there’s still something that drives me absolutely crazy about this: he’s using ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE TO ARGUE SOMETHING THAT INVOLVES THE FATE OF THE ENTIRE FREAKING PLANET. I’m sorry to yell. I just get worked up about this sometimes.

Anecdotal evidence, to summarize, is evidence that goes like this: “Well, I knew a guy once who smoked two packs a day and he lived to be fifty years old, so therefore it’s safe to smoke cigarettes! Hell, it might even make you healthier!”

Or “My friend Joe, he had one of those vitamin milkshakes and died the next day. THOSE THINGS KILL!”

Both of these are obviously ridiculous, but people are using them all the time in the argument on global warming. The Drudge Report had (what they thought was) a field day ranting about how it snowed in D.C. the same day as Al Gore spoke about global warming. Matt, it ain’t gonna stop snowing just because the world’s getting warmer! It sometimes snows in Egypt!

Almost anyone can see this after thinking about it for a couple of seconds

But, nevertheless, this kind of argument is not only still being used, it’s prospering, so I figured I’d throw my hat into the ring and release my list of ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE THAT PROVES SOME SHIT. (This time, the emphasis was not to suggest shouting, but that it was an important transition.)

1. ALL OF THE CRITICS HATED THAT NEW MOVIE, AND THEREFORE, IT SUCKED!

I read a review of that movie in the local newspaper by this kid who just graduated college a couple weeks ago.

THEREFORE, all the critics hated it.

THEREFORE, it sucked.

2. McDONALD’S IS A GREAT COMPANY TO INVEST IN!

I ate at McDonald’s yesterday. There were a lot of people there, and I really enjoyed the sandwich. I asked a friend of a friend whether they would recommend that I purchase some shares in the company, and they waited a few weeks before they emailed back “yes!!!!!1 strong by!”.

THEREFORE, McDonald’s is a great company to invest in.

3. IF YOU HAVE A PET, YOU WILL DIE!

Why? I had a friend, Ted, who never exercised and ate nothing but Ding-Dongs and Ho-Hos and all that, but then one weekened he got it in his head that a dog would be a good thing to own, so he went to the pound and picked one up, and while he was driving it home, the dog barked loudly in his ear, and my friend Ted panicked and jerked the wheel sideways, causing the car to crash into a ravine.

Ted survived the crash, as did the dog, who he had ironically named Lucky. He told Lucky to go get help, and Lucky took off looking for someone. Or, at least, Ted thought that’s what Lucky was doing. What Lucky was really doing was looking for a meal and a place to chill after that terrifying car crash with the guy he barely met. Ted died without ever seeing Lucky again.

THEREFORE, if you own a dog, you will probably fly off a cliff and die.

4. IT IS SAFE TO EAT SWORDS.

My friend Samson once swallowed a sword because he saw it in a circus sideshow and he bet Dan that he could do it. None of us thought he actually would, but Terri, who’s really cute, was there, and Dan didn’t want to look like a chicken in front of her, so he grabbed the nearest sword, which happened to be a 16th century ceremonial blade (we were in a Russian museum at the time) and he managed to wedge the whole thing down his throat before security tackled him. He had been fine until security showed up, but the tackle caused the sword to puncture his stomach, heart, and left lung, killing him almost immediately.

THEREFORE, swallowing swords is safe, but being tackled is not: take your children out of school sports and put them into sideshow training. ALSO, avoid Russian museums.